The question on every fan's mind: how many threes has Rudy Gobert made in his career? The answer, surprisingly, is zero... for now. Throughout his NBA tenure, Gobert has attempted a mere 14 three-pointers, all unsuccessful. This anomaly in a league increasingly reliant on outside shooting sparks a fascinating debate: does Gobert need a three-pointer to be a valuable player?
Let's delve into the numbers. Gobert's career three-point attempt rate sits at a measly 0.2 per game, a testament to his focus on paint dominance. This translates to a career three-point percentage of a disheartening 0%. It's important to remember that not all centers are expected to be lights-out shooters, but the complete absence of three-point attempts raises questions about Gobert's offensive versatility.
While Gobert's current shooting form suggests a struggle from beyond the arc, the possibility of development shouldn't be entirely dismissed. Players like Nikola Jokic, another dominant center, have added respectable three-point shots to their arsenal later in their careers. However, Gobert's playing style prioritizes interior presence, and dedicating significant practice time to long-range shooting could potentially detract from his core strengths.
The modern NBA landscape favors perimeter shooting, with teams prioritizing "spacing" - the ability to stretch the defense and create driving lanes. The center position, traditionally known for low-post dominance, is adapting to this new reality. Stretch-fours, centers who can space the floor with their shooting, are becoming increasingly valuable. While Gobert isn't a stretch-four, some analysts argue that even a rudimentary three-point threat could unlock new offensive possibilities for him and the Timberwolves.
Gobert isn't the only dominant center lacking a consistent three-point shot. Legends like Shaquille O'Neal and Dwight Howard rarely ventured beyond the paint. However, the league's offensive style has shifted significantly since their eras. Today's centers face a different challenge: defending the perimeter while maintaining their interior presence. Players like Joel Embiid and Jokic have embraced the three-point shot as a way to counter this challenge.
Advanced analytics paint a complex picture. While a three-point shot could theoretically improve Gobert's offensive rating, it's crucial to consider the potential downsides. If Gobert focuses on developing a long shot, it might come at the expense of his elite rebounding and rim protection. The analytics community is divided on the issue, with some arguing that Gobert's current skillset offers a greater advantage for winning.
The Minnesota Timberwolves coaching staff plays a vital role in maximizing Gobert's offensive impact. Running plays that leverage his post moves, screens, and offensive rebounding remain crucial. However, there's room for experimentation.
Here are some strategies coaches can employ to maximize Gobert's offensive impact, while acknowledging his lack of a consistent three-point shot:
Fan opinions on Gobert's lack of a three-pointer are divided. Some argue that his defensive dominance is enough to warrant his starting role, highlighting his rim protection and rebounding as invaluable assets. They point to past championship teams that featured dominant centers without a reliable three-point shot.
Others believe that in today's NBA, a center who can't space the floor becomes a liability on offense. They argue that defenses can sag off Gobert, clogging driving lanes for teammates. This perspective emphasizes the need for Gobert to at least develop a rudimentary three-point threat to keep defenses honest.
Ultimately, fan perception is shaped by individual preference and basketball philosophy. Some fans prioritize winning above all else, appreciating Gobert's impact regardless of his shooting limitations. Others value a more versatile skillset and believe a three-point shot would elevate Gobert's game.
Predicting the future is always tricky, but Gobert's dedication to improvement is undeniable. While there's no guarantee he'll become a lights-out shooter from deep, there's a chance he might add a serviceable three-point shot to his repertoire.
The key factor will be the Minnesota Timberwolves' coaching staff and front office's vision for Gobert's role. If they decide a three-point threat is essential, Gobert might dedicate practice time to honing his long-range shooting. However, if the focus remains on maximizing his current skillset, a consistent three-point attempt from Gobert might remain a distant dream.
Rudy Gobert's legacy will likely be defined by his defensive prowess and his impact on winning basketball. While his lack of a three-point shot sparks debate, it shouldn't overshadow his immense value. His ability to alter shots, control the paint, and rebound at an elite level makes him a cornerstone for any team.
The debate surrounding Gobert's three-point shot highlights the ever-evolving nature of the NBA. Whether Gobert embraces the three-pointer or continues to dominate with his interior presence remains to be seen. One thing is certain: Rudy Gobert's story is far from over, and his impact on the game of basketball will continue to be a source of discussion for years to come.